Four Years Not Enough for ‘Godfather of Spam’ (Network World)

Is four years and a $250,000 fine really the best punishment for the self-proclaimed “Godfather of Spam?” Put another way: Do we take the criminal aspects of spam seriously enough?

Is four years and a $250,000 fine really the best punishment for the self-proclaimed “Godfather of Spam?” Put another way: Do we take the criminal aspects of spam seriously enough?

Post a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment. To comment, first join our community.