• Register to access and contribute content

Memories of ALL-in-1: Tony Redmond Recalls

Curator’s Note: Tony Redmond is Author of “ALL-IN-1: A Technical Odyssey” and “ALL-IN-1 V3.0: Managing and Programming” and for many years has been a highly regarded expert on Microsoft Exchange Server.  — David Sengupta

My first exposure to enterprise email was in the form of CP/OSS in 1982. CP/OSS stood for the “Charlotte Package of Office System Services”. It was a form-driven Office Automation (OA) solution developed by the engineers who worked in the Charlotte, NC office of Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) and offered subsystems for EM (Electronic Mail), WP (Word Processing), and CM (Calendar Management). CP/OSS was the first human-friendly interface to email that I had ever seen and was a world apart from the command-line interfaces of tools such as VAXmail and UNIX mail.

DEC saw the value in CP/OSS and made it a corporate offering under the name ALL-IN-1 with its first release (Version 1.1) appearing in late 1982. Because of its user-friendliness and the ease in which you could use ALL-IN-1 as an integration platform for other products, ALL-IN-1 became one of DEC’s most successful products and had well over 5 million users by early 1990. This doesn’t sound very many users in terms of the hundreds of millions of people that connect to services such as Gmail and Hotmail today, but it was pretty impressive at a time when computer hardware and software was much more expensive and people simply didn’t have access to a service like email unless they had a very obvious business need.

ALL-IN-1 went through many ups and downs during its time. The major advances that I remember include:

  • First email system to boast a voice mail integration with ALL-IN-1 V2.0/DECtalk Mail Access (1984-85). When provoked, DECtalk could sing a mean “Moonlight in Vermont”!
  • First email system to appear in multiple languages with ALL-IN-1 Basic European Version – BEV (1986). I have some not-so-fond memories of trying to debug an ALL-IN-1 problem across a 300 baud telephone connection for a bank in Helsinki. Things would have been easier had the bank not run ALL-IN-1 in Finnish
  • Integrations with industry leaders Lotus 1-2-3 and WordPerfect along with DEC’s own VAX Notes and VAX/VTX (videotext) products in the 1988-1990 period
  • Failed attempts to integrate ALL-IN-1 with early Macintosh computers and slightly more successful integrations with DOS. DEC bought a product called OATmail from a small company based in St. Louis that became PC/ALL-IN-1 in 1989. It wasn’t the smoothest integration that ever existed but at the time, working with DOS just wasn’t easy for VMS applications
  • Distributed sharing with the ALL-IN-1 File Cabinet Server (FCS), first delivered in ALL-IN-1 V3.0 in 1992. The FCS made integration possible with DEC’s TeamLinks Windows (3.1) client to provide ALL-IN-1 with its first real GUI client

All products have their natural lifetime as technology evolves. I know of ALL-IN-1 customers who still ran the final variant (OfficeServer for OpenVMS) in 2010. Perhaps some still run the product today. What’s for sure is that ALL-IN-1 outlasted its competitors such as IBM PROFS and DISOSS. It was even seen by Microsoft as a prime competitor for Microsoft Exchange 4.0 during its development period in 1993-95, but I think that ALL-IN-1 was creaking at the seams at that time, largely due to some unfortunate management decisions and engineering investments taken by DEC when the product was at the height of its success. Those who can recall back that far might remember the fiasco called “ALL-IN-1 Phase II”.

Nothing ever quite replaced ALL-IN-1. DEC signed the “Alliance for Enterprise Computing” with Microsoft in 1995 and began the push to support Windows NT and its applications. That, allied to the huge losses that eventually forced DEC into the hands of Compaq in the 1998 acquisition, meant that ALL-IN-1 moved into the side-street of corporate hubris. It was unloved and forgotten by management, but fondly remembered by anyone who had the pleasure of figuring out what the separation of form and function really meant in the minds of the ALL-IN-1 developers.

One Trackback

  1. [...] DEC software specialists we trained in this manner and the sales representatives they converted, ALL-IN-1 systems became a $1 billion a year business for DEC for 18 years in succession.  When I [...]

Post a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment. To comment, first join our community.